Press Release
December 28, 2006
Question: Was Gerald R. Ford a born-again Christian ?
Facts: Gerald R. Ford was:
1) a Shriner and high-level Mason, and
2) a member of the Illuminati Establishment's new world order (one-worlder) organization, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
_____________________________________
Jesus Christ said, "Ye must be born again." John 3:7, KJB
"For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God." Romans 3:23, KJB
Only those who repent of their sins and receive Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour will be saved from hell, and enter heaven.
(John 3:16-18, Romans 10:9,10)
"For the wages of sin is death: but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Romans 6:23, KJB
A man is saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ (Messiah) alone.
(Ephesians 2:8, 9)
Water baptism as an infant does not save a man. Entering a church building does not save a man. Taking communion does not save a man.
Question: Was Gerald R. Ford a born-again Christian ?
Gerald Ford attended St. Margaret’s Episcopal Church in Palm Desert, CA.
www.thedesertsun.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061227/BREAKING/312270001
Jesus Christ said, "Ye must be born again." (John 3:7, KJB), but the Episcopal Church USA baptizes babies, and believes in the unbiblical doctrine of baptismal regeneration.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baptism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Episcopal
Was Gerald R. Ford a born-again Christian ?
Facts:
1) Gerald Ford was a Shriner and high-level Mason:
"The Shriners, or Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine, are an Order appendant to Freemasonry. Until 2000, one had to complete either the Scottish Rite or York Rite degrees of Masonry to be eligible for Shrine membership, but now any Master Mason can join."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shriners
In other words, until 2000, a person had to be at least a 32nd degree Scottish Rite Mason orYork Rite equivalent, to join the Shriners; but now, even a 3rd degree Master Mason can join.
Gerald Ford was a Scottish Rite Mason.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_Rite
Famous Shriners
Gerald Ford
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shriners
[underline emphasis added below; what really is the "religion" of Freemasonry ?]
"It is a men's fraternity rather than a religion or religious group. Its only religious requirement is indirect: all Shriners must be Masons, and petitioners to Freemasonry must profess a belief in a Supreme Being. In order to further minimize any confusion with religion, the use of the word "Temple" to describe Shriners' buildings has now been replaced by the phrase "Shrine Center.""
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shriners
Freemasonry is ecumenical, the "Supreme Being" in which Masons and Shriners profess belief, need not be the One, True God of the Bible, but can be for example the god of Islam, Allah. This is how Skull and Bones masonic secret society member George W. Bush can claim that Christians and Muslims worship the same God/god - he worships the Masonic false, ecumenical "god."
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=193746&page=1
Bush on Religion and God (Oct. 26, 2004)
President Says He Believes Muslims and Christians Pray to Same God
However, Jesus Christ is God (e.g., Isaiah 9:6, John 1:1, Matt. 1:23, John 20:28, Colossians 2:9).
Allah is not God (John 5:23, 1 John 2:22, 23). The Koran denies that Jesus is God,and denies that the historical event of the Crucifixion ever even took place.
Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by Me." (John 14:6)
Jesus Christ is right. George W. Bush, the Muslims, Masons, the Shriners, and the Skull and Bones Society, are all wrong. Who are you going to believe ?
2) Gerald Ford was a member of the Illuminati Establishment's NWO one-world government organization, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR):
2006 Council on Foreign Relations Membership Roster
Ford, Gerald R. – former President of the United States (1974-1977)
www.geocities.com/zembmor98/cfrroster2006.html
Ford's CFR membership goes back at least 24 years to 1982:
1982 Council on Foreign Relations Membership Roster
Ford, Gerald R.
www.geocities.com/cfrrosters/cfr1982.html
See a concise overview article about the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) on the internet at:
www.thenewamerican.com/tna/1995/vo11no10/vo11no10_tyranny.htm
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), along with the Trilateral Commission, Freemasons, Skull and Bones masonic secret society, and Bilderbergers are among the major globalist organizations whose leadership is working toward the New World Order of one-world global socialist tyranny, and the supersession of the United States Constitution by the UN Charter and other globalist instruments: e.g., NAFTA, CAFTA, FTAA, NAU, GATT, WTO, etc., etc., etc.
Just look across the Atlantic at how the Common Market of 1957 has become the European Union of today (with ongoing efforts to pass a European Constitution), and you will get an idea what these one-world, New World Order, global socialists want to do to North America (North American Union), then to the Western Hemisphere, and then to the whole globe. However, because Christ is King (1 Tim. 6:15), their anti-Christ modern day "Tower of Babel" will fail, just as the one in Genesis 11.
______________________________
______________________________
Nixon and 'Roe v. Wade' in '73
Nixon was President when the abominable, unconstitutional Roe v. Wade decision was announced, leading to the American Holocaust and genocidal murder in the womb of over 47 MILLION children by surgical abortion alone (www.ldi.org):
Gerald R. Ford was President of the United States for less than 2 1/2 years, when he became president on August 9, 1974 after the resignation of Richard Nixon, until Jimmy Carter (CFR/TC) won the Nov. 1976 Election, and was inaugurated in January 1977.
Richard Nixon had won the Nov. 1968 Election, and became president in January 1969. Nixon was re-elected in the Nov. 1972 Election, and was re-inaugurated on January 20, 1973.
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/pihtml/pi055.html
January 22, 1973:
Roe v. Wade, Doe v. Bolton - "The Court ruled that the fetus was not a "person" with constitutional rights and that a right to privacy inherent in the 14th Amendment's due process guarantee of personal liberty protected a woman's decision to have an abortion."
(quote - The World Almanac and Book of Facts, 2002, p. 539)
Note: The "Right to Life Act" was introduced by Rep. Duncan Hunter every year beginning in 1997 right through 2006, but was never given even a subcommittee public hearing by the Republican-majority which controlled the US House for 12 years (1995-2006). If passed, the RTL Act would recognize the legal "personhood" of the unborn child, and thus unravel Roe, ending U.S. Gov't. protection of abortion.
Right to Life Act (Introduced in US House) HR 552
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/HR552-03.doc
NO PUBLIC HEARING FOR RIGHT TO LIFE ACT, EVEN AFTER 12 STRAIGHT YEARS OF REPUBLICAN CONTROL !!!
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/HR552-05.doc
Note: Likewise, the Right to Life Act of SC, was first introduced in the SC House in 1998 by the late Rep. Terry Haskins, and then continuously through 2006 by Rep. Ralph Davenport. If passed into law, the RTL Act of SC would vest legal "personhood" at fertilization, thereby unravelling the legal argument of Roe. Although the RTL Act of SC did finally pass the SC House in 2005 (seven years after it was introduced in a Republican-majority SC House - 1995 to present), albeit with an unconstitutional, fatal flaw rape exception amendment, the bill nevertheless died in a SC Senate Judiciary Subcommittee chaired by Sen. Jim Ritchie at the end of the 2006 legislative session.
www.scstatehouse.net/sess116_2005-2006/bills/3213.htm
www.scstatehouse.net/sess116_2005-2006/bills/111.htm
www.RighttoLifeActofSC.netwww.ChristianLifeandLiberty.net
(click on "RTL Act of SC")
______________________________
______________________________
When the history of 1973 to 2006 America is (truthfully) written one day (it's being written accurately in Heaven now !), may it include the incontrovertible fact that every President and every Congress has had the power since January 22, 1973 to END THE ABORTION HOLOCAUST IN AMERICA by a simple majority vote in Congress (through the Art. III., Sec. 2. power of Congress to restrict the appellate jurisdiction of the US supreme Court); but instead, most Christians and pro-lifers foolishly and blindly followed the false leadership of Republican Party politicians and the National Right to Life leaders, and believed that looking to change the composition of the US supreme Court was the best strategy. Well seven out of nine Justices have been appointed by Republican Presidents, and still, 1 MILLION plus children continue to be aborted annually by surgical abortion alone in America.
PRESIDENT BUSH and CONGRESS COULD END ABORTION IN AMERICA IN ONE WEEK:
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/CCL05-21.doc
PRESIDENT BUSH and CONGRESS COULD END ABORTION IN AMERICA IN ONE WEEK
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/CONLAW08.DOC
US House limits jurisdiction of Federal Courts regarding the Pledge of Allegiance Employs Article III., Section 2. constitutional power of the US Congress to limit the appellate jurisdiction of the US supreme Court:
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/CONSTLAW06-01.DOC
Today's generation of "Christian" and "Pro-Life" Establishment leaders is acting like a generation lacking in spiritual "Vision" and Godly "Knowledge" - the American Holocaust and Genocide could have ended by the end of January 1973 before it really got started...................
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge..." Hosea 4:6a, KJB
"Where there is no vision, the people perish..." Proverb 29:18a, KJB
As one Christian pro-life leader has said, Abortion will end when the Church of Jesus Christ decides it will end. Christians, it can end now !
The Republican-majority in the US House had 12 years to make it happen, and they didn't even conduct a subcommittee-level public hearing.
However, a number of states introduced state-level abortion ban bills in 2005/2006.
The states of Georgia, North Dakota, Ohio, and South Carolina had "no exceptions" abortion ban bills, in Missouri had a constitutional amendment proposed, and in Michigan an attempt to put a constitutional amendment on the ballot was made.
11 State bills in 2005/2006 banning abortions:
- ALA, GA, IND, KY, LA, MO, ND, OH, SC, SD, TENN (over 20% of States in U.S.)
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/H3213-S111-121.doc
Georgia - HB 93:
http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2005_06/sum/hb93.htm
North Dakota - House Bill No. 1227:
www.legis.nd.gov/assembly/59-2005/bill-actions/ba1227.html
Ohio - HB 228:
www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=126_HB_228
South Carolina - S.111:
www.scstatehouse.net/sess116_2005-2006/bills/111.htm
Missouri - SJR43: Proposed Missouri State Constitutional Amendment - Senate Joint Resolution 43 to place proposed abortion ban Amendment on the ballot in November 2006:
www.senate.mo.gov/06info/bts_web/Bill.aspx?SessionType=R&BillID=165804
Michigan - Proposed Michigan State Constitutional Amendment - Citizen Petition Drive currently underway to place proposed "personhood" Amendment on the ballot in November 2006:
www.michigancitizensforlife.net/petition_language.htm
**************************************
The key is legal "personhood" for all pre-birth human beings at fertilization. No "exceptions." As demonstrated in the Roe v. Wade decision itself, "exceptions" to "personhood" are unconstitutional. The "life of the mother" exception in the Texas state law challenged in Roe helped open the door to federally-protected abortion in every one of the 50 states.
**************************************
Right to Life Act of SC - news conference and "Jesus Christ is Lord of the Gates" pro-life rally - Jan. 17, 2006
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/H3213-S111-1032.doc
In the very text of the Roe v. Wade US supreme Court decision it states, “[Texas] argue[s] that the fetus is a “person” within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment… If this suggestion of personhood is established, the [pro-abortion] case, of course, collapses, for the fetus’ right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment.” In other words, there never would have been legalized abortion under Roe v. Wade. But tragically, Texas had an “exception” which undermined their entire “personhood” argument. Justice Harry Blackmun wrote: “[ Footnote 54 ] When Texas urges that a fetus is entitled to Fourteenth Amendment protection as a person, it faces a dilemma. Neither in Texas nor in any other State are all abortions prohibited. Despite broad proscription, an exception always exists… But if the fetus is a person who is not to be deprived of life without due process of law, and if the mother's condition is the sole determinant, does not the Texas exception appear to be out of line with the Amendment's command? ...”
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=410&invol=113
The Right to Life Act of SC, in statutorily vesting legal “personhood” at fertilization for ALL human beings, satisifies the Roe formula published 33 years ago. The issue of legal “personhood” for ALL human beings, without exception, is a key to unlocking the 33 year old Roe v. Wade abortion enigma.
Jesus Christ (Y'shua Messiah) said,
"... I will build My church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."
Matthew 16:18
No King but King Jesus!
Steve Lefemine, pro-life missionary
dir., Columbia Christians for Life
Columbia, SC
www.ChristianLifeandLiberty.net
www.RighttoLifeActofSC.net
December 28, 2006
Note: No King but King Jesus! can be found on the homepage of http://www.christianlifeandliberty.net/
No comments:
Post a Comment