Kagan: Precedent can [sic] be more important than Original Intent
- (Video) Questions by Senator Cornyn (R-TX), June 30, 2010
Judicial activist Elena Kagan tells Senator Cornyn Precedent can be more important than Original Intent.
There is nothing more that any United States Senator, Republican or Democrat (who have also taken Oaths of Office to uphold the U.S. Constitution) needs to know about this domestic enemy of the U.S. Constitution - Elena Kagan, TO VOTE "NAY" TO HER NOMINATION. Oath-Breakers such as Lindsey Graham (RINO-SC) who voted "Yea" for Judicial Activist, Racist, La Raza Member, Feminist, Roman Catholic, Sonia Sotomayor on August 6, 2009, should be receiving volumes of e-mails and phone calls during the Senate recess break this week (July 5-9) to admonish him to uphold his Oath of Office this time, and TO VOTE "NAY" TO KAGAN'S NOMINATION.
If this pro-abortion, pro-sodomy, anti-Christ, feminist lawyer Kagan is confirmed by the U.S. Senate for appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court, we can expect her to work to re-make America in the image of her own anti-Biblical worldview; she would not be "hindered" by the Original Intent of the U.S. Constitution, and therefore she would not be "hindered" by the Oaths of Office she would take as a Supreme Court Justice, to uphold the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION:
Text of the Oaths of Office for Supreme Court Justices [ from the SCOTUS website ]
Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States are required to take two oaths before they may execute the duties of their appointed office.
1. The Constitutional Oath
As noted below in Article VI, U.S. Constitution, all federal officials must take an oath in support of the Constitution: [ emphasis added ]
"I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."
NOTE: - The Oath of Office is to support and defend the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, not Supreme Court Precedent !!!
- Also, Article VI., U.S. Constitution explicitly states there are three things which are "the supreme Law of the Land" –
1) The U.S. Constitution itself;
2) Laws of the United States (Federal Laws) made in pursuance thereof; and
3) U.S. Treaties
NOT ONE WORD IN THE U.S CONSTITUTION ABOUT THE SUPREMACY OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS OR PRECEDENT !
2. The Judicial Oath
"I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as _________ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God."
By her record, by her [repeated non-] answers before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, it is clear Obama's nominee Elena Kagan has no intention of upholding the Original Intent of the U.S. Constitution - therefore, no United States Senator should give Kagan their vote for confirmation; and every Senator should do their utmost to block her confirmation,including blocking the vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee, where Rule IV. of that Committee provides a way for the vote to be blocked, IF ALL SEVEN REPUBLICAN SENATORS ON THE COMMITTEE STAND FIRM, and do all within their power to block these DANGEROUS, UNQUALIFIED, DOMESTIC ENEMY OF THE CONSTITUTION.
"They that forsake the law praise the wicked: but such as keep the law contend with them." Proverb 28:4, KJB
Click here to read and download the complete report.